IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 104 COCP-2641-2026 Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Kuldip Singh . . . . Petitioner Vs. Varun Sharma, IPS . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA **** Present: - Mr.Ajay Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for alleged violation of the order dated 08.12.2025 passed by this Court in CRM-M-69009-2025 (Annexure P1). The operative part of the said order is as under:- “Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, to consider and decide the representation/complaint dated 19.08.2025 (Annexure P1), of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr.Ravinder Singh Rawal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and placed on record reply by way of an affidavit of Varun Sharma, IPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to show that the compliance has been made . Along with reply, speaking order dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure R1) is attached holding that no truth was found in the application given by the petitioner. VIVEK PAHWA 2026.07.16 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2641-2026 2026:PHHC: 097046 4. Since the order dated 08.12.2025 (Annexure P1), as passed by this Court in CRM-M-69009-2025, stands complied with as per the compliance report, nothing else is required to be done. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) 16.07.2026 JUDGE Vivek Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VIVEK PAHWA 2026.07.16 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document