22.07.2026 Serial no. 232 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1389 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with GR No. 2745 of 2024 arising out of Chanchal PS Case No. 1052 of 2024 dated 19.09.2024 u/s 179/180/61(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with section 25(I-B) (a) of the Arms Act. -And- In the matter of : Anarul Hoque … Petitioner(s) Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mollick Mr. Pikesh Kumar Chauhan … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, ld. APP Ms. Tanusree Kar … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year ten months; charge- sheet has been submitted and charges have also been framed. Learned advocate emphasizes that witness action has not been commenced. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the recovery was from the present petitioner and not only FICN but firearms also. There are number of criminal cases pending against the present petitioner, as such, the petitioner is having criminal antecedents. Having considered the factum of the present case, particularly, the FICN and the firearms which were 2 recovered at the behest of the present petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1389 of 2026 is dismissed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)