Appun @ Syed Ali v. The State Rep by Inspector of Police
/12650/2026 · 2026-06-03
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29660 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29660 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 Appun @ Syed Ali ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Chennai - 600 004. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to pass an order enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail pending investigation in Crime No.567 of 2025, dated 20.10.2025 on the file of the Respondent police and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner: Mr. G. Mohanakrishnan For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 324(2), 281 and 351(3) of B.N.S, 2023 and 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.567 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused threatened the witness in the murder case (defacto complainant’s daughter) and also threatened the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are nine previous cases are pending against the petitioner, and he is a history- sheeter. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration of the nature of the allegation against the petitioner and upon fact that the petitioner has got nine previous cases pending against him, the conduct of the petitioner in misusing the liberty by involving himself in similar offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VEDA To 1.Inspector of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Chennai - 600 004. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VEDA CRL OP No. 12650 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis