Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29658 (PAT)

Kamlesh Bind @ Kamlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./52805/2026 · 2026-08-17

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52805 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2026 Thana- BELAW District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1. Kamlesh Bind @ Kamlesh Kumar S/o Jai Shankar Bind R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 2. Shashi Ranjan Bind @ Shashi Ranjan Kumar S/o Vijay Shankar Bind, R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 3. Pramod Bind @ Pramod Kumar S/o late Ramjee Bind, R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 4. Kaushalya Devi @ Kaushalya Kumari wife of Vikash Bind R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 5. Suman Devi wife of Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Bind R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua 6. Mira Devi wife of Vijay Shakar Bind R/o village- Ameth, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 17-08-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rajendra Sah. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 190, 191(2), 352, 74, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner nos. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52805 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026 2/3 4, 5 and 6 are women. It is next submitted that informant alleges that there is a land dispute in the family and a case is pending, on basis of oral partition, the informant had sowed seed in the field and when she was cutting the crops, the petitioners came on 16.06.2026 and assaulted her and her family members causing injury to Mamta, Anil and Dhirendra. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are related and are having dispute relating to land, on account of which an altercation took place, as the side of the informant was cutting the crops during pendency of the civil case in between the parties. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific and even women members of the family have been implicated only to coerce male members into submission, so that they do not oppose the civil proceedings. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52805 of 2026(2) dt.17-08-2026 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Belaon P.S. Case No. 82 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. 7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T