RANI MAJHI v. RANDHIR KUMAR, THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF PENSION
CPAN/1998/2025 · 2026-07-22
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29655 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29655 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
22.07.2026 Sl. No.: 48 Court No.446 BM
CPAN 1998 of 2025
In WPA 24670 of 2015
RANI MAJHI VS RANDHIR KUMAR & ORS.
Mr. Subhrangsu Panda Ms. Haritri Roy Mr. Anupam Singha ... for the petitioner Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya Mr. Nilay Baran Mandal
… for the D.P.P.G
1. Mr. Mandal, learned advocate appearing for the alleged contemnor, submits that the order, the alleged violation whereof is the subject matter of the present contempt petition, has been complied with. The document filed on behalf of the alleged contemnor is taken on record.
2. Such contention has not been opposed by Mr. Panda, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner.
3. In view thereof, I am not inclined to proceed with the present contempt application any further. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.
( Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J. )