Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29651 (CAL)

CHANDAN KUMAR YADAV @ CHANDU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1398/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 241. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1398 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Ballygunge DD Police Station Case No. 01 of 2022 dated 08.01.2022 under sections 387/395/397/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 & 27 of the Arms Act. And In the matter of : Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandu ……Petitioner. Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Goutam Dey Mr. Neel Chakraborty ……for the State. Petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused persons namely, Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in CRM (M) 1201 of 2026. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the contention that the petitioner is not similarly placed as the other accused persons. Having regard to the same, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Petitioner be released on same terms and conditions as was imposed to Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Karu in CRM (M) 1201 of 2026. 2 Thus, CRM (M) 1398 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)