1 CGHC010416452023 2026:CGHC:32955 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 191 of 2024 1 - Devendra Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Changalal Chandrakar Aged About 70 Years R/o Near Sahu Sadan, Kelabadi, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Himachal Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Changalal Chandrakar Aged About 66 Years R/o Near Mangal Bhavan, Bhilai-3, Tehsil - Patan, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Neelmani Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Changalal Chandrakar Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Dundera, Pasgaon Utai, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Gayatri Chandrakar W/o Prem Chandrakar Aged About 56 Years R/o Behind Vivekanand Ashram, Mukut Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Smt Mamta Chandrakar W/o Suresh Chandrakar Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Bhaisbod Tehsil Patan District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Shronit Kumar Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Changalal Chandrakar Aged About 60 Years R/o Mill Para, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Sanjay Kumar S/o Shri Bisahu Ram Gond R/o North Vasundhara Nagar, Bhilai 3 Umda Road, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Raju S/o Shri Bisahu Ram Gond R/o North Vasundhara Nagar, Bhilai 3, Umda Road, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Shri Bisahu Ram Gond S/o Late Kunwar Singh Gond R/o North Vasundhara Nagar, Bhilai 3 Umda Road, District Durg (C.G.) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.30 18:36:38 +0530 2 4 - Additional Tehsildar Bhilai-3, Tehsil Bhilai 03, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Amit Nayak, Advocate For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 30.07.2026 1 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, by efflux of time and in view of the subsequent developments, the grievance raised in the present writ petition no longer survives for consideration. It is, therefore, submitted that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2 Learned State counsel has no objection to the aforesaid submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners. 3 Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, this Court is of the opinion that no effective cause of action survives for adjudication in the present matter. 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh