Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29648 (CAL)

BAHARAM SK @ BAHARAM SEKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1412/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.250. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 1412 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Palashipara Police Station case no. 119 of 2026 dated 03.03.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Baharam Sk @ Baharam Sekh ……Petitioner. Mr. Asraf Mondal .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Abdul Aziz Mondal Mr. Partha Pratim Sinha ......for the De-facto complainant. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya Mr. Arnab Sau ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than four and half months and has been accused for attempting to murder his wife. According to the petitioner marriage was solemnized 15 years earlier and thereafter he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned advocate for the de-facto complainant on the other hand submits that petitioner wanted divorce and as such he attacked the victim and tried to throttle her. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that there are bruises and injuries inflicted along with ligature mark available at the person of the injured. There are medical documents to substantiate the overt acts of the present petitioner. 2 Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and the charge-sheet refers to 11 witnesses, I am of the opinion that on stringent conditions the petitioner be released on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, the petitioner, namely, Baharam Sk @ Baharam Sekh shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehatta, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Court. Additionally, petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction of Palashipara Police Station without permission of the learned Court/Trial Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 1412 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)