Rajaram v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/13606/2026 · 2026-06-03
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29647 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29647 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 Rajaram ..Petitioner Vs State by, Inspector of Police, Palacode Police Station, Dharmapuri District. [Cr.No.135 of 2026] ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioners on Bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.135 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 191(1), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(2) of BNS Act, 2023, in Crime No.135 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity arising out of an earlier incident at a biriyani shop, on 13.04.2026, the petitioner along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries using a beer bottle and a knife. Hence, the case. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner has got 13 previous criminal antecedents. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), it is amply clear that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every likelihood of committing similar offence, which would pose a menace to society. Therefore, considering the larger interest of the society, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VEDA To 1.Inspector of Police, Palacode Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VEDA CRL OP No. 13606 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis