Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2964 (CHH)

SMT. RATNA SAHU v. KAMLESH JOSHI @ GAJANI

CRMP/2838/2024 · 2026-02-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6655 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2838 of 2024 1. Smt. Ratna Sahu W/o Shri Mukesh Sahu Aged About 33 Years Caste Teli, R/o Vindhyavasini Ward, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Iqbal Khilachi, S/o Ayyub Khilachi, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Amapara Ward, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. (Complainant) ... Appellant versus 1. Kamlesh Joshi @ Gajani S/o Not Known Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Anda, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Accused) ... Respondent For Appellant : None For Respondent : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 05.02.2026 1. Present is an application under Section 419(4) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of leave to file acquittal appeal. 2. It transpires from the order sheet that on 14.11.2024, Mr. B.L. Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the default has been removed and it was directed the Registry to verify MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.02.06 12:27:27 +0530 2 and to proceed further. However, on 15.12.2025, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner in two rounds and the case was adjourned. Again on 07.01.2026, when the matter was called for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition and again the matter was listed on defaults. Though no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, but two weeks time was granted to the petitioner to remove the default, yet till date the default could not be removed by the petitioner and no one appears on his behalf and no representation is made and today also the matter has been listed for orders on default. 3. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner lost his interest by efflux of time and accordingly, the present CRMP dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Manish