CWP-21195-2026 [1] 140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21195-2026 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Geeta Rani ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. In the present writ petition, following prayers have been made:- “Civil Writ Petition Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of 'Certiorari for quashing the impugned action of the respondents, whereby Plot No.915, Sector-30, Pinjore, District Panchkula, Haryana duly allotted to the petitioner, has been cancelled in an arbitrary and mala fide manner; AND For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith accept the due payments from the petitioner and consequently, restore her allotment in consonance with HSVP Policy; PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.16 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21195-2026 [2] AND For issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus' restraining the respondents from e-auctioning the Plot No.915, Sector-30, Pinjore, District Panchkula, Haryana allotted to the petitioner and thereby not creating any third party rights, during the pendency of present petition;” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, the petitioner had filed revision petition challenging the order dated 24.08.2022 passed by the Chief Administrator, HSVP vide which he had decided to put the plot in question for e-auction. It is submitted that the Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department, Chandigarh vide order dated 01.08.2023 had remanded the matter back to the Chief Administrator, HSVP for passing a detailed order in the case. It is submitted that no order subsequent to the remand order has been passed by the Chief Administrator, HSVP and as per the information of the petitioner, the respondents are again trying to e- auction the property in question. 3. On a pointed query raised by this Court, learned State Counsel has very fairly submitted that as per the instructions, fresh order after remand has not been passed by the Chief Administrator, HSVP but the Chief Administrator, HSVP would pass the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from today. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- i) The Chief Administrator, HSVP, is directed to pass a detailed speaking order in compliance to the order of remand dated PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.16 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21195-2026 [3] 01.08.2023 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from today after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or her representatives. ii) Till the time the said fresh decision is taken, the respondents are restrained from e-auctioning the property in question. iii) Grant of the said interim order should not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the Chief Administrator, HSVP would consider the case independently, in accordance with law. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.16 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document