Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29625 (CAL)

DEBABRATA SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1853/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 693. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (A) 1853 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Barasat PS Case No. 244 of 2026 dated 13.06.2026 under Section 308(2) of the BNS, 2023.. And In the matter of : Debabrata Sarkar ……Petitioner. Mr. Arabinda Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Saha Ms. Shreyosi Chakraborty ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Brajesh Jha, APP Mr. Somnath Adhikary ……for the State. Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was the Chairman of the District Primary School Council and the present case has been instituted against him as he demanded a sum of Rs. 2 Lakhs and 50 Thousand from different Assistant Teachers for transferring them to a nearby location. It has been further contended that petitioner tendered his resignation on 11.05.2026. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the different affected persons. The statement of the 2 complainant was recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023. I have taken into account the overall circumstances but the State has not been able to satisfy this Court to the tune that any amount was given to the present petitioner. Having considered the same and the present case is of misuse of power for transferring persons for non-payment, I am of the opinion that although a case may be made out for investigation but custodial detention of the petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is in progress petitioner shall for the first time meet with the Investigating Officer of the case by 7th August, 2026 and thereafter follow up with the investigation on the date fixed by the Investigating Agency till the charge sheet is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (A) 1853 of 2026 is allowed. 3 Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)