[2026:RJ-JP:17510] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1810/2020 Pappu Meena S/o Parsadi Meena, aged about 42 years, R/o Beelbad Ki Jhopdi (Chodagaon). (Owner Of Tractor No. RJ-34-/RB-0798) ----Appellant Versus 1. Babu Lal Meena S/o Nand Lal Meena, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Smt. Ramdhani W/o Babu Lal Meena, aged about 45 years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. 3. Hol Singh Meena S/o Sardar Singh, R/o Ram Singh Pura, Police Station, Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). (Driver Of Tractor No. RJ-34/RB-0798) 4. United India Insurance Company Limited, through its Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, 01, Ashok Circle, Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan). (Insurance Company of Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1484/2020 1. Babu Lal Meena S/o Nand Lal Meena, aged about 47 years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) 2. Smt. Ramdhani W/o Babu Lal Meena, aged about 45 years, R/o Narayanpur Tatwada, Tehsil Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) ----Appellants Versus 1. Pappu Meena S/o Parsadi Meena, aged about 42 years, R/ o Bilwad Ki Jhopadi (Chodagaon) Tehsil Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj). (Owner of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798) 2. Hol Singh Meena S/o Sardar Singh, aged about 30 years, R/o Ramsinghpura, Thana Bamanwas District Sawai [2026:RJ-JP:17510] (2 of 3) [CMA-1810/2020] Madhopur (Raj). (Driver of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB-0798) 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, 01, Ashok Circle, Alwar (Raj). (Insurance Company of Vehicle Tractor No. RJ-34-RB- 0798) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Chanchal, for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Jain Mr. Amar Nath Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Judgment 24/04/2026 1. The present appeals have been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 30.11.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karauli (for short ‘Tribunal’), in MAC Case No.40/2018, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed. 2. A letter dated 17.07.2025 has been received from the learned Tribunal, informing that in Execution Case No.13/2021 titled as ‘Babulal vs. Pappu’, the parties have entered into a compromise before the National Lok Adalat held on 22.12.2024. The said compromise has been arrived at for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Only), and the said amount has been paid by the owner of the vehicle, who is appellant in CMA No1810/2020, vide Cheque No.870817 dated 07.11.2024, and therefore, no amount of compensation remains due from the owner of the vehicle. [2026:RJ-JP:17510] (3 of 3) [CMA-1810/2020] 3. Since the parties have entered into a compromise, nothing survives in these civil misc. appeals. 4. Both the appeals are accordingly, dismissed. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J 67-68 - RAVI KHANDELWAL