NIRANJAN v. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/12779/2026 · 2026-06-03
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29616 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29616 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026
1. Niranjan
2. Rohit ..Petitioners Vs The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Nolambur Police Station, Anna Nagar, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No. 213 of 2026) ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 213 of 2026 pending investigation on file of the Respondent Police (Nolambur Police Station). For Petitioner: Mr.Magesh Kumar For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and 140(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Crime No.213 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners along with other accused kidnapped the defacto complainant and abused her in a filthy language. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners have committed serious offence and therefore, if anticipatory bail is granted, it would affect the morale of the society. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegation against the petitioner and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VEDA To 1.The Inspector of Police, Nolambur Police Station, Anna Nagar, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VEDA CRL OP No. 12779 of 2026 03-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis