SATYADEV AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/15565/2026 · 2026-07-15
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29613 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29613 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-15565-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115
CWP-15565-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 SATYADEV AND OTHERS ....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG Haryana. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR
, J. (Oral)
1. This Civil Writ Petition is being filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to decide the representation-cum-appeal dated 12.10.2025 (Annexure P-5), preferred by the petitioners claiming reservation in promotion to Class III and Class IV posts under the Scheduled Caste category, which has remained pending before respondent No.2 for more than one year, within a time-bound period, and to grant notional and PARUL VERMA 2026.07.16 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
2 CWP-15565-2026 consequential promotion to the petitioners, if found eligible, from the date on which their counterparts in the unreserved category were promoted to the higher posts.
2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners confines the prayer to the limited extent that the petitioners would be satisfied if their representation-cum-appeal dated 12.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) is decided by respondent No.2/the competent authority by passing a speaking order within a time-bound period.
3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to the respondent No.2/competent authority for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation-cum-appeal dated 12.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order.
4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the respondent No.2/competent authority is
directed to consider the representation-cum-appeal dated 12.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 02 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are PARUL VERMA 2026.07.16 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
3 CWP-15565-2026 found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by the respondent.
5.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 15.07.2026 parul verma Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PARUL VERMA 2026.07.16 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.