JASWINDER SINGH GOVT CONTRACTOR v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/20744/2026 · 2026-07-10
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29611 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29611 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-20744-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 124
CWP-20744-2026
Decided on:10.07.2026 Jaswinder Singh
. . . Petitioner Versus
State of Punjab and others
. . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikas Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the due amount of `38,75,020 against the bills dated 05.03.2024, 17.09.2024 and 26.05.2025, Annexures P-2 to P-4, respectively, including security, against work of construction of pump chamber with WC, OHSR at Government college, Kalanaur, Block Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur.
2.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from Mr. Vijay Kumar, Executive Engineer (XEN), Water Supply and Sanitation Department, Division-I, Gurdaspur, submits that the sanctioned amount against the aforesaid bills will be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months.
MEHAK HURIA 2026.07.16 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CWP-20744-2026
-2-
3.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
4.
Ordered accordingly.
5.
In case the amount is not paid within three months from today, it shall carry interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum thereafter till the date of actual payment.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 10.07.2026
JUDGE Mehak
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No
MEHAK HURIA 2026.07.16 12:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment