BUTA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRM-M/38373/2026 · 2026-07-16
Sanjay Vashisth
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29610 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29610 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
163
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38373-2026 DECIDED ON: 16.07.2026 BUTA SINGH AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Ishan Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
SANJAY VASHISTH
, J (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.0193 dated 29.12.2018, under sections 406 and 420 of IPC (sections 467, 468, 471/120-B and 201 of IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Panjokhra, District Ambala, on the basis of the compromise dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-3).
2. Allegations in the FIR are that accused persons accepted illegal gratification (bribe) for arranging employment in the District Courts at Ambala as well as in the Education Department. It is alleged that they demanded a total sum of Rs.10,00,000, out of which an advance amount of Rs.6,50,000 was paid to them. Offences alleged are neither compoundable nor liable to be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) 16.07.2026
JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.07.16 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh