Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29609 (PAT)

Bhavesh Vatsa v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./55412/2026 · 2026-08-17

R P Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55412 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- AKBARNAGAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bhavesh Vatsa S/o Jaiy Shankar Jha Resident of Village - Dalsingh Sarai, PS - Bibhutipur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 17-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(c) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act. 3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that there is recovery of 100.32 gram smack along with 100 ml of Gujrex-T- Codeine Phosphate and Triproliding Hydrochloride Syrup from a vehicle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55412 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026 2/3 present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of the contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the recovered contraband being below the commercial quantity and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55412 of 2026(3) dt.17-08-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Rajorshi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T