Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29608 (CAL)

GOUTAM ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/13618/2026 · 2026-07-23

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31 23.07. 2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab WPA 13618 of 2026 Goutam Roy Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Ms. Sima Sengupta. … for the petitioner. Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Ld. AGP. … for the State. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved that medical reimbursement for the treatment of his wife and daughter, to which he is entitled, has not been disbursed on account whereof the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2. The petitioner has also made a representation on January 27, 2026 before the respondent no. 2, which is pending consideration. 3. In view thereof, I direct the respondent no. 2 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in line with the Notification No. 164-F(Med)WB dated November 6, 2023 read with clarification by way of Memorandum No. 187-F(Med)WB dated December 26, 2025. The entire process of consideration and passing a reasoned order will be completed by August 31, 2026, with the resultant order thereof duly communicated to the petitioner within a week thereafter. 4. With the afore-stated direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 2 5. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)