Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29605 (MAD)

Tea Board of India v. Parry Agro Industries Ltd.,(Carolyn Estate)

CMP/9914/2026 · 2026-06-08

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No.9914 of 2026 in WA SR No.186734 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.9914 of 2026 in WA SR No.186734 of 2025 Tea Board of India, (Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Government of India) Rep. by Deputy Director of Tea Development, Shelwood, Club Road, P.O. Box No.6, Coonoor -643 101, Nilgiris. Appellant(s) Vs Parry Agro Industries Ltd., (Carolyn Estate) Mangorange Group (Carolyn and Attikunna Estates) Rep. by its Power of Attorney Holder, Abraham Mathew, Having Office at Parry Agro Industries Ltd., Mangorange Group (Carolyn and Attikunna Estates) Mangorange Post, Nilgiris- 643 220 and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr. K.Ramanamoorthy ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No.9914 of 2026 in WA SR No.186734 of 2025 For Respondent(s):Ms. Surabi.P. for Mr. Roshan Balasubramanian for R1 Mr. V.Ashok Kumar Senior Panel Counsel for R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This application has been filed to condone the delay of 59 days in filing the appeal. 2. Satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, the delay of 59 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 4. The Registry is directed to number the appeal. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 08.06.2026 bbr ___________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis