2026:JHHC:9736 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11147 of 2025 Prakash Yadav, aged about 30 years, Son of Mathura Mahto … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, Advocate --- 05/7th April 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 410/2025 for the offence registered under Section 103(1), 85, 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and cognizance has been taken under Sections 103(1), 85, 115(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits supplementary affidavit before this Court, which is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2025. The learned counsel has submitted that as per the post-mortem report and the evidence of the doctor, the cause of death could be ascertained only upon the report by FSL and no ante-mortem injuries were found on the dead body. He submits that as per FSL report also, no sign of poisoning has been found. He has further submitted that marriage was for last 10 years and three children were also born out of wedlock. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner had left the victim immediately before her death outside the house of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submissions are not in dispute. 2026:JHHC:9736 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.04.2026 Uploaded On: 08.04.2026 Mukul/-