HILAL AHMAD DEHRAB AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION BATAMALOO AND OTHERS (POLICE / HOME)
CRM(M)/171/2026 · 2026-04-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 296 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 296 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 182 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) No. 171/2026 CrlM. No. 402/2026 Hilal Ahmad Dehrab and Another …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S.H.Thakur, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. Through Police Station Batamaloo and Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.04.2026
01. While the matter was being argued, when the
learned counsel for the petitioners was confronted with regard to the maintainability of present petition seeking quashment of FIR No. 09/2026 lodged by respondent no. 1 in terms of Section 74,351 (2), 127 of Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023, he seeks withdrawal of the same with liberty to file fresh petition challenging the aforesaid FIR and consequential proceedings.
02. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 07.04.2026
“Shamim Dar”