Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29591 (CAL)

PETITIONER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1431/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22/07/2026 D/L – 268 Court No.35 S. Kundu C.R.M.(M) 1431 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Kasba P.S Case no. 464 of 2025 dated 08/10/2025 under sections 95/96/98/99/3(5) of the BNS read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 5/6/7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. In the matter of: XXX …Petitioner. Mr. Rajdeep Sengupta …for the petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das Ms. Anuska Ghosh …for the State. Memo of evidence filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for bail on health issues as also the merits of the case. Learned advocate for the State has produced the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the same and is of the opinion that the petitioner is connected in the alleged offence according to the prosecution case. If there are health issues or his mother has passed away in that case, the petitioner would apply before the Jail Authority under the Jail Code. Concerned authorities would dispose of the same in accordance with law. However, the issues relating to bail is concerned, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 1431 of 2026 is dismissed. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)