Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29590 (CAL)

SAMSUDDIN SEKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16029/2026 · 2026-07-22

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15 2222..0077..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 16029 of 2026 Samsuddin Sekh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sk. Saifuddin …for the petitioner Mr. Anindya Basu Mr. Pijush Biswas …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that petitioner is dissatisfied with inaction on the part of the concerned police authorities in taking steps based on the complaint lodged. 3. Prayer is made in this writ petition for registration of FIR taking note of the complaints lodged by the petitioner. 4. State respondents are represented by learned advocate who has filed a communication of Officer-in-Charge, Sagardighi P.S., Jangipur Police District and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication is made over to the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2 5. It is disclosed in the communication that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner criminal prosecution being Sagardighi P.S. Case No. 401/2026 dated 11th July, 2026 is initiated and investigation is going on. 6. In view of steps taken by the concerned police authorities no further order need be passed on this writ petition and same stands disposed of. 7. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate, if occasion so arises. 8. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)