Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2959 (UTT)

RAMCHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/176/2026 · 2026-03-20

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1985 BA1 No.176 of 2026 Ramchandra Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vikas Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is filed by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.0006 of 2026 under Section 8/21 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Mukhani, District Nainital during the pendency of trial before trial court below. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case and there is no independent witness; applicant has no criminal history. He submits that 83 gram of smack was recovered from the possession of the applicant, which is below the commercial quantity; grounds of arrest have not been communicated to him. He further submits that he has the responsibility of his family and due to false implication his family is facing great hardship. 6. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Without expression any opinion on the final merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Ramchandra be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 20.03.2026 Arti