Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2959 (RAJ)

DINESH DHABAS SON OF SHRI RAMJI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1046/2022 · 2026-04-23

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17324] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7473/2022 Rakesh Kumar Mund S/o Sh. Mangal Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dhani Mundawali, Village Malakali Post Reengus, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Subhash Chand S/o Ramchandra, R/o Dhani Derawali, Tan Kalyanpura, Police Station Shri Madhopur, District Sikar. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1046/2022 Dinesh Dhabas Son of Shri Ramji Lal, R/o Dhani Tinkwali, Village Post Gadh Bhopji, Thoi, Tehsil Khandla, District Sikar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Shubash Chand Son of Shri Ramchand, R/o Ward No. 4, Kalyanpura, Derawali Dhani, Shrimadhopur, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar Jangid for Mr. Rajesh Goswami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 23/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in [2026:RJ-JP:17324] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7473/2022] the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. As per the report received from the Special Judge, POCSO Act 2012 & Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, No.02, Sikar, the petitioners have been acquitted vide judgment dated 20.04.2024. Hence, under these changed circumstances, these instant petitions have become infructuous. 4. Considering the above, these instant petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application(s) and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 5. The report received from the Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases No.02, Sikar, dated 22.04.2026, is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam/70-71