ARB-624-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Post Graduate M/s Sanyog Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and another CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Sahil Shehrawat, Advocate Ms. for the petitioner None for the respondents. LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that vide order dated April 7, 2026 passed by a Coordinate Bench, the Registry in two newspapers having wide circulation where the office of respondent No.1 is situated. 2. Vide order dated May 15, 2026 the recorded that publication has been effected through newsp However, none appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 on that date. In the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned to today. 3. When the matter was taken up today, neither is respondent No.1 represented nor any adjournment behalf. 2024 (O&M) Sr. No. 215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB Date Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research and others Versus Sanyog Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and another HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sahil Shehrawat, Advocate and Ms. Eliza Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for the respondents. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that vide order dated April 7, 2026 passed by a Coordinate Registry was directed to take steps for publication of notice in two newspapers having wide circulation where the office of respondent No.1 is situated. Vide order dated May 15, 2026 the recorded that publication has been effected through newsp However, none appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 on that date. In the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned to today. When the matter was taken up today, neither is respondent No.1 represented nor any adjournment IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-624-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 Institute of Medical Education and Research and others …Petitioners Sanyog Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and another …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI and Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that vide order dated April 7, 2026 passed by a Coordinate was directed to take steps for publication of notice in two newspapers having wide circulation where the office of Vide order dated May 15, 2026 the Coordinate Bench recorded that publication has been effected through newspapers. However, none appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 on that date. In the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned to today. When the matter was taken up today, neither is the respondent No.1 represented nor any adjournment been sought on its VANDANA 2026.07.16 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ARB-624-202 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner arbitration clause is contained in Clause 35 of the Agreement dated February 11, 2016. respondent No.1 was allowed to run a chemist shop in Block of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. 5. Dispute and differences arose between the parties. The parties were referred to arbitration proceedings by order dated April 5, 2019. Thereafter the Arbitrator. However, the learned Arbitrator recused himself vide letter dated November 26, 2022 parties after March 2020 due to pandemic/lockdown. 6. Since the pleadings made by learned counsel for the petitioners remain uncontro Court appoints Ms. Justice (Retd.) Jaishree Thakur, a former judge of this Court, H. No. 36, Sector 8 Chandigarh as between the parties, subject to compliance of 7. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbit 8. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator. 2024 (O&M) Learned counsel for the petitioner lause is contained in Clause 35 of the Agreement dated February 11, 2016. The said agreement was a Deed of Licence whereby respondent No.1 was allowed to run a chemist shop in Block of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. Dispute and differences arose between the parties. The parties were referred to arbitration proceedings by order dated April 5, . Thereafter the parties appeared before the nominated learned Arbitrator. However, the learned Arbitrator recused himself vide letter dated November 26, 2022 as there was no communication after March 2020 due to pandemic/lockdown. Since the pleadings made in the petition and the arguments made by learned counsel for the petitioners remain uncontro Court appoints Ms. Justice (Retd.) Jaishree Thakur, a former judge of this Court, H. No. 36, Sector 8-A, Chandigarh, Mobile No. 98141 digarh as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate between the parties, subject to compliance of Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbit Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding on the learned Arbitrator. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the lause is contained in Clause 35 of the Agreement dated The said agreement was a Deed of Licence whereby respondent No.1 was allowed to run a chemist shop in the Emergency Block of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Dispute and differences arose between the parties. The parties were referred to arbitration proceedings by order dated April 5, parties appeared before the nominated learned Arbitrator. However, the learned Arbitrator recused himself vide letter there was no communication from the after March 2020 due to pandemic/lockdown. made in the petition and the arguments made by learned counsel for the petitioners remain uncontroverted, this Court appoints Ms. Justice (Retd.) Jaishree Thakur, a former judge of A, Chandigarh, Mobile No. 98141-25236 adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties, subject to compliance of the statutory requirements. Liberty is granted to the parties to raise all claims, counter claims, defences, pleas etc. before the Learned Arbitrator. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the parties shall remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings and any observation made hereinabove will not be binding VANDANA 2026.07.16 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ARB-624-202 9. A request letter along Ms. Justice (Retd.) Jaishree Thakur. 10. With the directions aforesaid 11. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. July 10, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 2024 (O&M) A request letter along with a copy of this order be sent to Retd.) Jaishree Thakur. With the directions aforesaid ARB Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 6 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No with a copy of this order be sent to ARB-624-2024 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, are accordingly, disposed of. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2026.07.16 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document