1 CGHC010029382026 2026:CGHC:32434 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 388 of 2026 1 - Rameshwar Tillasi S/o Laxman Tillasi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Khursitola (Gram Panchayat Ardiya), Ward No. 12, Post- Dongariya, Tahsil- Paraswada, District- Balaghat (M.P.), Presently Residing At C/o Mithlesh Kumar Sahu, Ward No. 18, Kailash Nagar, Birgaon (Khamtarai), Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Rohit Kumar Joshi S/o Late Ratna Joshi Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Charouda (Mohtara), Police Station- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Rupi Joshi W/o Rohit Kumar Joshi Aged About 53 Years R/o Village- Charouda (Mohtara), Police Station- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Charvind Joshi S/o Late Hitesh Joshi Aged About 11 Years Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Grandfather Rohit Kumar Joshi (Claimant No. 1), R/o Village- Charouda (Mohtara), Police Station- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - Lokranjan Joshi S/o Late Hitesh Kumar Joshi Aged About 8 Years Minor Through Their Natural Guardian Grandfather Rohit Kumar Joshi (Claimant No. 1), R/o Village- Charouda (Mohtara), Police Station- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 5 - Gayatri Joshi D/o Rohit Kumar Joshi Aged About 23 Years R/o Village- Charouda (Mohtara), Police Station- Kasdol, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 6 - Pankaj Hirwane S/o Late Sundar Lal Hirwane Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Rupjhar Ward No. 03, Police Station- Rupjhar, Tahsil- Faraswada, District- Balaghat (M.P.) (Driver Of Offending Vehicle No. Cg-04/mg-1829) 7 - National Insurance Company Limited Office At T.P. Hub Mobin Mahal, Infront Of Rajbandha Maidan, Second Floor, G.E. Road, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle No. Cg-04/mg- 1829) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : None For Respondent No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Palash Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Ms. Suchi Ramteke, on behalf of Mr. B.N. Nande, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 28 / 07 / 2026 1. None appears on behalf of the appellant in second round. 2. The present is the owner’s appeal. 3. It transpires from the record and the prayer made in the appeal that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge pekde Digitally signed by VIJAY BHARATRAO PEKDE Date: 2026.07.29 19:25:17 +0530