IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11758 of 2026 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar S/o Bhuneshwar Yadav, R/o Village- Raja Bigha, Panchayat- Paharpur, P.S- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary (Home), Police Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya. 5. The Nodal Officer, District Magistrate, Moinitering Cell, Gaya. 6. The Anchaladhikari, Fatehpur, District Gaya. 7. The Officer-in-Charge, Fatehpur Police Station, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 07-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred: (i) to issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondents (Specially the respondent No. 4) to depute magistrate along with armed forces and Mahila Police to ensure delivery of possession in favour of the petitioner with respect to a settled land appertaining to Khata No. 52, Khesara No. 253 and 254 total area 1.42 acere situated at Village- Rajabigha, Panchayat- Paharpur Patna High Court CWJC No.11758 of 2026(2) dt.07-08-2026 2/2 P.s. and Anchal-Fatehpur, District- Gaya. (ii) To any other relief/s to which the petitioner may found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. After some arguments, Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha submits that he shall be approaching the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gayaji, respondent no. 4 to make him realize that the action is needed pursuant to the letter no. 680 dated 07.05.2026 issued by the Circle Officer, Fatehpur, Gayaji and addressed to the concerned officer. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities who shall look into the matter and do the needful at an earliest and after noticing all the parties, will act in accordance with law. Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U