Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./56455/2026 · 2026-08-13
Satyavrat Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29561 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29561 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56455 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh Son of Ramkishun Singh Resident of village - Sukki, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Khajauli, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kumari Pallavi For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 13-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 630 liters of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Shambhu and Suresh in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56455 of 2026(2) dt.13-08-2026 2/2
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 204 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. 7.
It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of two cases only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T