GOURI HALDAR @ GOURAI SARKAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1163/2026 · 2026-07-22
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29557 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 29557 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L676 22.07.2026 Bpg. Allowed
C.R.M. (A) 1163 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No.710 of 2025 dated 04.11.2025 under Sections 108/3(5)/85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act;
Gouri Haldar @ Gourai Sarkar & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Kaushik Choudhury . …for the petitioners.
Mr. Pritam Roy. …for the State.
Mr. Pritam Roy, learned advocate, appears for the State. His appointment may be regularised by the concerned authorities.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the sister-in-law who stayed separately and have been unnecessarily implicated in the instant case.
Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary and referred to the statement of the son under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as the statement of the neighbours. Charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional court.
I have taken into account the overall materials appearing including the statement of the son under Section 183 of the BNSS. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that the custodial detention of the petitioners are unwarranted. As such, the prayer
2 for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed..
Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Gouri Haldar @ Gourai Sarkar and Parboti Sannyasi @ Parbati Sarkar shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
As the charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional court, this order of anticipatory bail will remain valid for a period of six weeks.
Accordingly, CRM(A)1163 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)