Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29553 (CAL)

GOLAM NABI AJAD v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1414/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.251. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 1414 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chanchal Police Station case no. 145 of 2026 dated 17.02.2026 under Sections 115(2)/69/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Golam Nabi Ajad ……Petitioner. Ms. Sujata Das .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, Ld. APP Mr. Amal Kumar Datta ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 139 days, charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such petitioner be released on bail as both the petitioner and the victim are adults. Learned advocate appearing for the State has referred to the statement under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the statement of the victim and I am of the opinion that a child was born by the relationship and the accusations are that the petitioner is a married person who committed the alleged offence. Having regard to the totality of circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Petitioner will renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of victim is over before the learned trial Court. 2 Accordingly, CRM (M) 1414 of 2026 is rejected. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)