IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48174 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2024 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Yadav, s/o Upendra Yadav, r/o vill- Herudiyara, PS- Kasim Bazar, Dist-Munger ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad For the Informant : Mr.Ratnakar Ambastha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 18-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kasim Bazar PS Case No. 278 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. 3. Earlier vide order dated 15.11.2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50240 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court considering the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner with a direction to the learned trial court to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a C.I.S.F. personnel and he has not committed any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48174 of 2026(3) dt.18-08-2026 2/2 offence in the manner alleged. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired during investigation on the disclosure made by co-accused Chandan Kumar and Shiv Shankar Pandit. The petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2025. Learned counsel next submits that no incriminating articles have been recovered on disclosure made by co-accused or petitioner. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail application of the petitioner. 7. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously. rinkee/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T