- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010150432019 NC: 2026:KHC:36873 MFA No. 4462 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4462 OF 2019(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. THIMMA REDDY S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. K.T. THIPPESWAMY S/O THIMMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDENT OF BEDAREDDYHALLI VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK - 577 538. …APPELLANTS (A1 - THIMMA REDDY, A2 - K.T. THIPPESWAMY - APPELLANT (ABSENT)) AND: 1. DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICE, DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER, B.D. ROAD, CHITRADURGA TOWN - 577 501, R.C. OWNER OF AMBULANCE BEARING REG. NO.KA 16 G 0379 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, KGID MOTOR VEHICLE BRANCH POLICY, Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010150432019 NC: 2026:KHC:36873 MFA No. 4462 of 2019 ISSUING AT BENGALURU BRANCH OFFICE KGID, SIDDAPPA COMPLEX, NEAR SHARADAMMA RUDRAPPA KALYANA MANTAPPA, NEHRU NAGAR, HOLALKERE ROAD, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. 3. K.T. SHASHIKALA W/O PRADEEP KUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDENT OF BEDAREDDYHALLI VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK - 577 538. …RESPONDENTS (R1 - DISTRICT HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE OFFICE CHITRADURGA - SERVED, R2 - THE BRANCH MANAGER KGID CHITRADURGA - SERVED; R3 K.T. SHASHIKALA - SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04/04/2018, PASSED IN MVC NO.1138/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-V, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010150432019 NC: 2026:KHC:36873 MFA No. 4462 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed seeking enhancement of compensation in a case of death. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a retirement memo. Notice issued to the appellant was duly served on him. However, he has neither appeared before this Court nor engaged another counsel. 2. Therefore, it is evident that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting the appeal and no purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE TMP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3