IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59261 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2025 Thana- RAJIVNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Bipin Kumar @ Vipin Kumar S/o Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar R/o Village- Bara, PS- Ranitalab, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhukar Anand, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No.199 of 2025 registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 74, 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1) 117(2), 109, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNS’). 3. As Per FIR, petitioner and other co-accused persons alleged to assault informant during the course of occurrence by using iron rod, lathi etc. Petitioner alleged to carry rifle during the occurrence. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59261 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner that as per direction of this Court in its writ jurisdiction, Khatal in Patna was removed from open place of patna and when after passing considerable time period, this informant was again in process to erect “Khatal”, which was objected by the petitioner side, due to which the present occurrence took place. It is submitted that the petitioner side also lodged a case against informant which has been registered as Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025. It is also submitted that the factual aspects of this case suggest that no overt act from petitioner during the occurrence was done rather he was alleged carrying only rifle. In this context, it is also submitted that no allegation of firing was raised. Explaining criminal antecedent, Petitioner found involved in one more criminal case with the husband of the informant, where he is on bail. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as the occurrence prima facie appears free fight in nature, where the allegation of firing is not Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59261 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 available against this petitioner, rather he was alleged only to carry fire arm during the occurrence, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna, in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No.199 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Aniket/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) U T