IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26967 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2022 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Pramod Kumar Son of Jay Narayan Yadav Resident of Village- Parmanandpur, P.S.- Murliganj, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Prasad, Advocate Ms. Pooja Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Informant : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Anil Kr Sinha, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate Ms. Shibu Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 253 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section(s) 147, 341, 307, 302, 120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, altogether 13 persons are alleged to have assembled with the intention of killing the deceased, and out of them, four persons are alleged to have fired upon him. However, the post-mortem report indicates only one wound of entry with a corresponding wound of exit on the body Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26967 of 2026(6) dt.19-08-2026 2/3 of the deceased. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025. It is further submitted that the post-mortem report does not support the allegations made in the FIR and after recovery of the dead body of the deceased, all the accused persons have been implicated in the present case on account of previous enmity arising out of an earlier murder. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the period of custody and the materials available on record, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 253 of 2022. 8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26967 of 2026(6) dt.19-08-2026 3/3 prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U