Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29531 (CHH)

MANJU NIRMALKAR, v. UJJIWAN SMALL FINANCE BANK,

WP227/154/2024 · 2026-07-27

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010065782024 2026:CGHC:32448 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 154 of 2024 Manju Nirmalkar, D/o Late Suresh Nirmalkar Aged About 38 Years R/o House No. 192, Ganga Nagar, Bhanpuri, Raipur, Dist. Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ujjiwan Small Finance Bank, Through Authorized Officer, Shri Rajeev Baghmar, S/o Shri K. P. Baghmar, Office- Plot No 17-A (Part-C), Ground Floor And First Floor, Bamru Colony, Choura Compound, Indore (M.P.) Branch Office- Near Yashwant Hospital, Tatyapara Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Shri Ganesh Body Proprietor, Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 34 Yeasrs, Address- Ring Road No. 01, Tatibandh Road, Near Uncle Dhaba, Bhanpuri, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, C.G. Pin No. 492008. 3 - Mukesh Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 192, Ward No. 4, Jagdish Timber, Ganga Nagar, Bhanpur, Raipur, C.G. Pin No. 492008 4 - Vandana Rajak W/o Mukesh Kumar Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 192, Ward No. 4, Jagdish Timber, Ganga Nagar, Bhanpur, Raipur, C.G. Pin No. 492008 5 - Rakesh Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar Aged About 36 Years R/o House No. 192, Ward No. 4, Jagdish Timber, Ganga Nagar, Bhanpur, Raipur, C.G. Pin No. 492008 6 - Sheela Bai W/o Late Suresh Kumar Aged About 57 Years R/o House No. 192, Ward No. 4, Jagdish Timber, Ganga Nagar, Bhanpur, Raipur, C.G. Pin No. 492008 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 28/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the present writ petition has now become infructuous as the proceeding before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur has already been disposed of. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit