D/L669 22.07.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (A) 932 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Sagarpara Police Station Case No.496 of 2025 dated June 1, 2025 under Sections 25(1)(a)/27/35 of the Arms Act; Sujon Sk. @ Sujan Sk. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Navanil De Mr. Srinjan Ghosh. …for the petitioner. Mr. Pritam Roy Ms. Triparna Roy. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in connection with the instant case on the basis of the statement of other accused persons and no seizure has been effected from the present petitioner. On the other hand, learned advocate appearing for the State submits that not only there has been huge seizure of arms in the present case but further there are antecedents of the present petitioner and which relates to cases under the Arms Act being Ranitala P.S. Case No.75 of 2024. Having considered the previous antecedents of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Petitioner, if so advised, will appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail. 2 Accordingly, CRM(A)932 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)