IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 1. CWP-10796-2022 (O&M) YASHWANT SINGH AND ORS V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2. CWP-1005-2023 (O&M) SANDEEP KHATKAR V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr. Dhanajay Mittal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned Senior counsel submits that similar controversy stands already decided in a batch of petitions with lead case of Ved Pal Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP-12263-2018, decided on 22.03.2022, against which no LPA was filed which covers their case on all fours as that also relates to directions passed by the District Grievance Committee and may be disposed of as such, which learned counsel for the respondents, despite their best efforts, have not been able to controvert the factual position and draw out any distinctive aspects in the aforementioned judgment or cite any contrary thereto. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4, in fact, refers to an undertaking given in CWP-10796-2022 that they would not get swayed by such directions. 3. Disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment. 4. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file(s). (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 15.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document