Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29513 (PNJ)

TARANBIR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/20591/2022 · 2026-07-14

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[261] Taranbir Singh, Panch State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] present writ petition [2] [3] disposed off 14.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20591 Date of Decision : Taranbir Singh, Panch Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. None for respondent No.5. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for writ petition has become rendered infructuous Dismissed as infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands off. 14.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 20591-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. ounsel for the petitioner states that the has become rendered infructuous by efflux of time. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No states that the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.15 17:30 I agree to specified portions of this document