Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29504 (PAT)

Rambali Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./58238/2026 · 2026-08-20

R P Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58238 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2026 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Rambali Yadav S/o Hari Yadav R/o Village - Ambatari @ Ammatari, P.S - Chauparan, District - Hazaribagh, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate Mr. Gulistan Naz Tabazzum, Advocate Mr. Nasar Iqbal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 20-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 374 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 850 liters liquor was recovered from five motorcycles. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58238 of 2026(2) dt.20-08-2026 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no recovery of liquor has been made from the motorcycle of the petitioner and he has been arrested on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 374 of 2026. Rajorshi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T