Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29503 (PAT)

Brijesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./57104/2026 · 2026-08-18

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57104 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Siwan ====================================================== Brijesh Kumar Yadav Son of Shri Ramawadh Prasad Resident of Village - Pachrukhia, P.S.- Banakata, District- Deoria (Uttar Pradesh). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 18-08-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 47 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 315 litres of liquor from a four wheeler. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57104 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/3 create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that the petitioner was completely unaware that Ritesh would misuse his vehicle in the manner as alleged who was also apprehended from the spot along with Verma Kumar Yadav. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Siwan Excise P.S. Case No.170/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57104 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 3/3 provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T