Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 2950 (RAJ)
GAVARIKA, DAUGHTER OF SHRI ASHOK DADICH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2652/2026 · 2026-04-27
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2950 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2950 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2652/2026
1. Gavarika, Daughter Of Shri Ashok Dadich, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Devdungri, Mirja Bawdi Road, Madanganj Kishagarh District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Shrimati Anju Sharma Wife Of Shri Ashok Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Devdungri, Mirja Bawdi Road, Madanganj Kishagarh District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Ashok Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Devdungri, Mirja Bawdi Road, Madanganj Kishagarh District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. Abhishek Dadich Son Of Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Devdungri, Mirja Bawdi Road, Madanganj Kishagarh District Ajmer, Rajasthan
5. Fateh Chand Son Of Tulsi Ram, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Billu Police Station Parbatsar District Didwana Kuchaman Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Vedprakash Dadich Son Of Shri Kaluram, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Virat Nagar House No. 48 B Near Kids Convent School Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ritika Jain, Adv. Ms. Ranu Khangarot, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Mohit Pareek, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 27/04/2026 fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk ifjoknh@izR;FkhZ Øe&2 dk la;qDr :i ls fuosnu gS fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS]
[2026:RJ-JP:17768] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2652/2026] v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa jkthukek is’k fd;s tkus ij jkthukek ;ksX; vijk/kksa esa jkthukek rLnhd fd;k tkdj mu vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr fd;k tk pqdk gS] ysfdu 'ks"k vijk/k /kkjk 191¼2½@190] 333@190] 110@190 ch-,u-,l- esa ekeyk jkthukek ;ksX; ugha gksus ls rLnhd ugha fd;k x;k gSA mijksDr rF; U;k;ky; ds le{k j[krs gq;s fuosnu fd;k fd /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq;s jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij yafcr vkijkf/kd fopkj.k dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh vikLr dh tkdj vfHk;qDr dks nks"keqDr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ;kph@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) tks vkjksi gaS] og vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; vijk/k dh Js.kh dk ugha gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; jkthukek gks tkus dh fLFkfr rFkk i{kdkjksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, vc v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ fof/kiw.kZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.
State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA mijksDrkuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk iqfyl Fkkuk&enuxat] ftyk&vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 397@2024 rFkk mlls lacaf/kr fo}ku vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k Øe&02 fd'kux<+] vtesj ds ;gka yafcr vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 10@2025 dh dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkdj ;kph@vfHk;qDr 1- xokfjdk] 2- Jherh vatq 'kekZ] 3- v'kksd dqekj 'kekZ] 4- vfHk"ksd nk/khp rFkk 5- Qrsg pan dks lHkh vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /118