Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2950 (PNJ)

SUNITA v. RAGHAV THUKRAL AND OTHERS

INCOMP/1027/2026 · 2026-05-01

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115 Sunit Raghav Thukral CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Sheena Khanna, by the Registry on Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel party, who filed it, to re However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble C INCOMP No.1027-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP No. 1027 DIARY No.10660623 Date of decision : Versus Raghav Thukral and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The aforesaid petition was filed on Sheena Khanna, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry on 24.1.2026. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble C "All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in the Objection Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1027 of 2026 10660623 Date of decision :-01.05.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The aforesaid petition was filed on 22.1.2026 by Ms. Advocate. However, certain objections were raised As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on 20.3.2026 :- "All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in the Objection Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Advocate to collect his case for re objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the records. May 01, 2026 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No INCOMP No.1027-2026 (O & M) today, within one month of the date of public of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate orders." Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to collect his case for re-fili objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate Even after the publication of the note requesting the filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document