Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2950 (JK)

RUKIYA AKHTER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) TH.S.H.O P/S YARIPORA

Bail App/101/2026 · 2026-09-11

Sanjay Parihar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bail App. No. 101/2026 1 | P a g e S. No. 06 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Bail App 101/2026 RUKIYA AKHTER …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Tahir Ahmad Bhat, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) TH.S.H.O P/S YARIPORA ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE O R D E R 11.09.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. 2. During the course of hearing, ld. counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that, subsequent to the order dated 08th October, 2025, whereby the petitioner’s earlier application for grant of bail was declined, the Trial Court has examined further witnesses, including the Investigating Officer. It is submitted that certain material aspects have emerged from the testimony of the Investigating Officer which, according to the petitioner, demonstrate that the search was not conducted in accordance with law. On the strength thereof, it is contended that the legality of the search, and consequently the evidentiary value of the recovery allegedly effected pursuant thereto, would require consideration. 3. Since, at the time when the earlier bail application came to be dismissed, only some of the prosecution witnesses had been examined, and further witnesses have since been examined, there appears to be a change in circumstances subsequent to the dismissal of Bail App. No. 101/2026 2 | P a g e the earlier bail application. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the learned Trial Court afresh for grant of bail by bringing to its notice the subsequent developments, including the alleged lacunae which, according to the defence, have surfaced during the examination of the witnesses subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier bail application. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant application is disposed of, without disturbing the order dated 08th October, 2025, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court afresh for grant of bail on the basis of the subsequent developments. In the event such an application is filed, the Trial Court shall consider and dispose of the same expeditiously, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the disposal of the present application and having due regard to the circumstances which have arisen subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier bail application. 5. The application stands disposed of in the above terms.A copy of this order be transmitted to the learned Trial Court for information and compliance. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR 11.09.2026 Shabroz