SRI. N. NARAYANAMURTHY v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
WP/2550/2026 · 2026-04-15
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2949 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2949 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20503 WP No. 2550 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2550 OF 2026 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
SRI N NARAYANAMURTHY, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, B.M.T.C., DEPOT NO.14, R.T. NAGAR DEPOT, R/AT MELEKOTE VILLAGE, TUBAGERE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU-561 205. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SOMA SUNDER RAO R, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, NORTH EAST DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, TTMC BUILDING, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT RENUKA H.R, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.01.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND PRODUCT ON ANNEX-B TO GRANT DIFFERENCE OF GRATUITY AMOUNT AND THE INTEREST THEREON AS ORDERED BY THE LABOUR OFFICER AND THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, ANNEX-A ORDER DT 01.01.2024 NO.LOB-3/P&A/CR 40/23/24, SUB-DIVISION-3 BENGALURU.
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20503 WP No. 2550 of 2026
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus against the respondent/Corporation to consider the representation dated 09.01.2024 submitted by the petitioner which is marked at Annexure - B.
2. Admittedly, petitioner is a retired employee of the respondent/Corporation. Petitioner claims that he retired on 31.01.2022 and gratuity amount is paid in part and interest and balance is not yet paid.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount payable to the petitioner is determined by the Controlling Authority and no appeal is filed against the said
order dated
01.01.2024. Petitioner has submitted a representation on 09.01.2024 to comply the said order.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent/Corporation would submit that the said representation dated 09.01.2024 is not yet considered by the respondent and the claims of several retired employees are yet to be considered.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20503 WP No. 2550 of 2026
5. Since, it is submitted that the representation dated 09.01.2024 is not yet considered, the respondent/Corporation is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2024 and to pass suitable order/endorsement on the said application within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30