Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29480 (PAT)

Rajpati Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./59241/2026 · 2026-08-19

Chandra Shekhar Jha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59241 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2025 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger ====================================================== Rajpati Yadav S/o Rajpati Yadav R/o Village - New Tola Banarsi Basa Raghunathpur, P.S. - Shampur, Dist. - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajit Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2.The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Dharahara P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS. 3. As per FIR stolen tractor bearing registration no. BR 08 G7154 was alleged to be recovered beside the house of this petitioner. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that admittedly the recovery of stolen tractor was made from the gali behind the house of this petitioner, which is an open place, accessible by general public. It is pointed out that in fact the same stolen tractor was brought in nearby gali of the petitioner house, by his son-in- law, who upon arrest confessed before the police that he committed theft of the tractor of the informant alongwith co- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59241 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026 2/2 accused Sonu Kumar, Kallu Kumar and Raushan Kumar without naming even this petitioner. Arguing further, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases of different nature where he is on bail. 5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail. 6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of investigation, which suggest implication of this petitioner for only reason that the tractor was recovered from near by gali of his house, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM III cum Sub Judge IV, Munger /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Dharahara P.S. Case No. 74 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Sudha/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T