Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29477 (CAL)

TOHIDUR ALAM @ MD TOHIDUR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1810/2026 · 2026-07-22

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.07.2026 Serial no. 685 [G.S.D] CRM (A) 1810 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with PT No. 1411 of 2025 arising out of Kaliachawk PS Case No. 1665 of 2025 dated 24.09.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act. -And- In the matter of : Tohidur Alam @ Md Tohidur Alam … Petitioner(s) Mr. Sekhar Kr. Basu, Sr Adv. Mr. Mainak Gupta Mr. Priyankar Ganguly Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Suraj Mishra … for the State-respondent(s) Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrested on the basis of statement of a co-accused and there are no other incriminating materials appearing against the present petitioner. Learned Senior advocate also submits that similarly placed accused person has been granted anticipatory bail in CRM (A) 1190 of 2026. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are statement so far as the complicity of the present petitioner is concerned. 2 Having considered that the petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused person who has been granted bail in CRM (A) 1190 of 2026, I am inclined to allow the prayer for anticipatory bail of the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Tohidur Alam @ Md Tohidur Alam] be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1810 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3