Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29476 (PAT)

Dhananjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./46105/2026 · 2026-08-13

Alok Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Dhananjay Yadav S/o Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Yadubansh Nagar, P.S- Bharatkhand, Parabatta, Dist- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate Ms.Ayushi, Advocate Mr.Amit Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 13-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 423 of 2022, instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 379, 385, 356, 506 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that informant was assaulted and looted by some unknown miscreants. The name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the confessional statement of the co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46105 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026 2/3 conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the name of petitioner surfaced in this case on the confessional statement of the co-accused. The counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2026. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard the parties. Taking into consideration the fact that Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case, and the name of the petitioner has been subsequently added in this case and also considering the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 423 of 2022, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or close member. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46105 of 2026(3) dt.13-08-2026 3/3 (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T