Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 29471 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH SEHGAL v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHER

CWP/28283/2018 · 2026-07-14

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 (1) CWP-28283-2018 (O&M) Om Parkash Sehgal vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd and Others (2) CWP-23442-2019 (O&M) Shanti Parkash Sharma vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have been denied 3rd ACP on account of they having forgone the promotion for 6 months to the post of Circle Assistant, however, similarly circumstanced Balwan Singh, who was working as Commercial Assistant was also promoted as Circle Assistant, however, he has forgone promotion for 1 year, as is apparent from the order dated 01.03.2011, Annexure P-6, whereby his promotion was cancelled, however, he has been granted the benefit of 3rd ACP w.e.f. 13.11.2010 vide order dated 29.11.2012, Annexure P-7. He prays that their claim be re-considered in terms thereof. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to re- consider the claim of the petitioners, expeditiously, in accordance with law, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered MOHIT 2026.07.15 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28283-2018 (O&M) & CWP-23442-2019 (O&M) -2- to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 14.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.15 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document